Ask Question
Sign Guest book

 
About Lymphoma
| Advocacy | Art | CAM & Life Style | Clinical trials | Docs & Centers | Guidelines at Diagnosis | How to Help | Side Effects | Support | Symptoms  | Tests | Treatments | Types of Lymphoma


Experts

Patients Against Lymphoma

 

Advocacy > The the NCI's cancer Human Biobank (caHUB)

Last update: 09/12/2011

TOPICS

Background | Key Components | Why Now? | News | Ownership Issues
Ethics of Requiring Tissue Biopsy for Study Participants

TOPIC SEARCH: PubMed

From our perspective, creating a human bio-bank - with high standards for uniform capture, annotation, storage, analysis, and sharing of data - is essential to making progress against cancer.  Such a resource would be equivalent to the electric power infrastructure as a driver for our economy.  Consider the inefficiency if each company had to generate it's own electric power in addition to doing it's primary business.  Imagine the confusion if one State used AC and the other DC! 

The Need for Harmonization in Bio-banking to 
Realize the Potential of 21st Century Medicine  Dr. Anna Barker, NCI PDF 

"Biospecimens are materials from the human body, 
such as tissue, blood, plasma, and urine, 
that can be used for cancer diagnosis and analysis." 27


Background

The National Biospecimen Network (NBN) is a blueprint for progress that will create a national bio-informatics bank that's accessible to all scientist. 

"The number one roadblock to our progress, as defined
at the think tank Dialogues on Cancer (2002),
 is the lack of availability of high quality, highly characterized 
human specimens for translational research."


Key components  

(1) Standardized capture, storage, and analysis of large numbers of annotated biospecimens (tissue, blood, urine)  - so that research findings are comparable and the results are statistically powered; 

(2) Bio-Informatics software that can store the considerable amounts of clinical and molecular data, linked to the tissue.  

(3) Common data elements, so that each research group is reporting and describing data using the same terminology.  

(4) Data sharing, including publishing of failed research, so discovery and validation of biomarkers can be  accelerated and resources can be deployed efficiently. 

(5) Privacy protection - to inspire trust, and ensure participation and  continued public funding.

"Currently there are no standardized procedures for 
collecting, processing, storing, and distributing biospecimens." 27

 

bullet
caBIG: Power of Connection™ - Dr. Barker provides a preview.   cabig.cancer.gov
The video explores the challenges of cancer research and how caBIG™ 
will speed research discoveries and improve patient outcomes by connecting 
the cancer community.
Also see Glossary  http://cabig.cancer.gov/resources/glossary.asp

The big picture:  the purpose of the study, the need for reliable findings that can be translated into clinical practice, such as biomarkers that predict response to treatment or toxicity. 

I think John Donne's meditation applies well to clinical science, except that this ideal is rarely met. That is, the success or failure of a therapy is often a page torn out, which does not inform the science - the book we use to guide how to treat others. 

" Ultimately, it may well be that the optimal treatment will be determined by patient 
clinical and biological characteristics." ~ Dr. Bruce Cheson [4]


Why now?  

FDA ... the vast majority of investigational products that enter clinical trials fail.
Often, product development programs must be abandoned after extensive investment of time
and resources. This high failure rate drives up costs, and developers are forced to use the profits from a decreasing number of successful products to subsidize a growing number of expensive failures. [6] 

Gene expression largely determines how tumor cells behave: how aggressively or slowly they will grow, how resistant they are to dying, how and why they respond to different treatments. 

New technologies, particularly microarrays, can help to characterize gene expression in malignant cells, allowing scientists to see what is wrong, and compare one person's cancer to another's. For the first time in history we can begin to see what we are trying to fix at a fundamental level.  

"The trick with molecular targeting is that you have to be able to match the drug to the patient. And until you understand how the drugs work, why they work, and for whom they work,  your results might not be as remarkable as you would like for them to be.  Once we understand how to match the drug to the patient, I think we will see many, many examples like imatinib [Gleevec]."  
~ Dr. Brian Druker, Howard Hughes Medical Institute [2]

The NBN approach to research starts with obtaining fresh frozen tissue. Importantly, standardized methods of collecting and testing tumor and normal tissue, open access to the tissue,  test results, and associated clinical data will:

bullet Enable scientist to more rapidly identify the gene expressions that distinguish normal from malignant cells and assist in the "development of molecularly targeted therapies that have specificity and potency for defined cancer types." [1]
   
bullet Enable scientists to link clinical behavior (how aggressive or indolent the cancer is likely to be) to gene expression, and thus better advise patients about treatment selection and timing. 

The variable clinical course of patients given the same diagnosis stems, in part, from the underlying molecular diversity among their tumors. [1] ~ NBN blueprint 

bullet Help identify viral factors that may be present and may contribute to causing, promoting, or maintaining malignant behavior of lymphoma cells.
  
bullet Help scientists to discover how genes function in immune cells, and apply this knowledge to the treatment of numerous diseases.
  
bullet Allow scientists to correlate genetic expression with individual responses to treatments, in order to:
 
bullet

enable doctors to better match the drug to the patient

bullet

spare patients from the side effects of ineffective treatments

bullet

identify patients in need of experimental approaches to treatment [3]

bullet

reduce health costs by minimizing the trial and error approach to selecting interventions

bullet

identify genes in tumors that lead to treatment resistance

bullet

select patients most likely to benefit from targeted investigational drugs in clinical trials
 

bullet

Help identify tumor-associated antigens that can form the basis for therapeutic cancer vaccines.
   

bullet Help discover cells in the lymphoid microenvironment that may be promoting or inhibiting lymphomas.

Note that the NBN should not represent a challenge to existing systems that are functioning at high levels. Rather the NBN will incorporate the "best practices" in existing systems of excellence. Identifying, developing, and sharing standards for "best practices" is a process and not an end.  Thus, the NBN blueprint will incorporate new ideas and innovations as they occur. It will constantly improve and lead to innovations that will make a real difference. 

" As we move to consider these tumors by their genetic abnormality (genotype) rather than their 
cellular appearance (phenotype), one converts the generalities of leukemia, lymphoma, and 
myeloma into hundreds of diseases with distinct genetic causes, clinical manifestations, 
and drug responsiveness."  29

Briefly, the NBN is a blueprint for creating standards for how to:  

bullet

Obtain and store fresh frozen tissue suitable for consistent molecular analysis

bullet

Apply disease-specific cDNA microarrays in order to measure the expression level of several thousand mRNA, simultaneously in biological tissue, and conduct tests to validate the tools and the procedures

bullet

"Screen for genes that are differentially expressed between normal and diseased tissue in order to find novel targets for drug development or to find new single-gene markers of clinical outcome." 10

bullet

Protect donor confidentially

bullet

Create an open and usable informatics data system, which can provide open access to tissue and data - including longitudinal data (case data followed over time) - thus enabling the correlation of gene profiles with treatment outcomes 

Standards is not a "sexy" word, but adopting standards is the key to releasing the potential of technologies in any age. The Internet was made possible by adopting standards (TCP/IP), as are the infrastructures we all take for granted: electricity, telephone, plumbing, etc.

Shared and open access means small companies can compete as well as large. It shifts the advantage from financial muscle to ideas and creativity. Open access will create productive competition, and capital interest will be sure to follow. Openness will replace the practice of restricting access in order to gain or maintain a commercial advantage - buying up DNA patents, for example. 

* Importantly, the data obtained from tissue is patient DNA. Thus, it should not be "owned" by any group. The NBN blueprint cites this basic fact.

The following is one example of how the NBN approach can foster more rapid approval of new drugs. It should be noted that it's not a futuristic example, as this approach has already been applied to a drug called Herceptin. A drug that would not have won FDA approval without rationally selecting patient populations. This according to NBN background text. And Gleevec is a well-known example of a rationally-developed targeted drug that has made an enormous impact on patients with CML, a type of leukemia. 

Translational or targeted drug development and assessment using NBN resources could go as follows

bullet

Standardized collection of biospecimens. 

bullet

Find novel targets using microarrays.

bullet

Refine diagnosis and identify high- and low-risk disease.

bullet

Find clinically useful biomarkers by identify correlations between gene expression profiles and treatment responders. 

bullet

Select the appropriate patients for targeted-phase studies.

The result is that smaller studies will be needed to achieve statistically significant results, providing relief from the competition for patients.

Fewer patients will be subjected to the toxicity of drugs that cannot help them. 

The new favorable circumstances causing increased interest in trials and cancer research among patients, investigators, commercial entities ...

Obviously, it will be best if all organizations work cooperatively and support broad adoption and full funding of the NBN blueprint. But it will also help if support for the idea is expressed by the patient community

Since, the blueprint is not cancer-specific, the rationale and need should have broad appeal. Since cancer affects almost everyone in the long run, it should have broad support in the general public when they become educated about the potential and the need.  

~ Karl Schwartz 

Click here to comment on the NBN


Is it Ethical to Require a Tissue Biopsy of Participants in Therapeutic Clinical Trials?

Requiring a biopsy for entry into a therapeutic study is a contentious area in clinical research … some arguing that it can sometimes be a form of coercion … as in: sorry, no tissue, no trial.

In a treatment study, the rationale for the need to acquire additional tissue (such as by biopsy) should be presented clearly, because it is not a minor or risk-free procedure. Further, the need for a biopsy should be stated up front before the patient travels to the center. 

Patients should look for eligibility criteria such as:

"Measurable disease by CT scan, defined as at least 2 lesions that measure >1.5 cm in a single dimension (one of which is superficial and easily accessible for biopsy)."

"The consent form should clearly indicate whether the new biopsy is required to make the treatment decision in the trial itself, or whether it is only done to provide information leading to future decision making (benefiting the future, but not the patient him/herself), a more altruistic decision to make."  (Hans, advisor to PAL)

Further, it should be made clear to the patient that NOT giving consent for additional uses of the tissue -- beyond the trial -- will not exclude you from participating in the trial.  (Mike)

Mike also writes: 

"The rationale behind the requirement drives the ethics of whether a biopsy should be taken.

Does the biopsy help to safeguard the patient’s health? It may be necessary to examine it to confirm the diagnosis or the grade of the disease – both of which may be critical in accepting the patient for the trial.
(Similarly a bone marrow biopsy is required to make sure that you are eligible for radioimmunotherapy in regular clinical practice.)

Does the biopsy provide a critical “before” snapshot of the disease, prior to treatment? Trials are quite different from normal treatment. For standard care, we don’t really care about the mechanism of treatment so much as the results – is the cancer gone? Has progression been halted? Did the patient achieve a complete response? In a clinical trial, researchers often need to know more than that – the actual mechanism by which the experimental treatment is working."

There are many dedicated people involved in the approval of trial protocols, such as the Institution Review Board, the FDA and in many cases a team of experts which will often include patient advocates involved in the vetting of the trial protocol.  So in most cases when tissue is required it will based on sound research principles, needs, and also attention to patient safety.  For example, tissue might be required when there's a need to make sure that you are eligible for the trial protocol, or for studies of targeted drugs when t can be important to make sure that the drug that you will receive is appropriate  -- that the target exists in the tumor, in order to avoid giving you a drug that is unlikely to be effective but sure to have side effects. 

NOTE:  The existence of the target in the tumor cells improves only the plausibility that the drug can have an effect on the tumor, but it in no way assures that you will benefit - that you will live longer or better because of it.  

Can tissue from a prior biopsy be used instead?

It depends on what kind of information is needed from the tissue and how that tissue was captured, fixed, and stored; and perhaps how long ago it was acquired – because the lymphoma cells can change over time.  It may also depend on the willingness of the center that stores the tissue to release it to another center.

Finally, Mike writes:  "Considering the woefully small participation in clinical trials overall, it is to researchers benefit to reduce the number of barriers erected to potential participants, and to collect only the tissue that is necessary to protect the patient and to validate the study results."  We cannot make progress against lymphoma (the purpose of research) without examination of the genetics and underlying biology of the cells, which can be unique to each patient, which needs to be correlated with clinical outcomes to help one day personalize our care. i

Many thanks for the informed comments of advisors on this topic, which we've copied directly into the text.

~ Karl (advocate's perspectives)

Additional reading:

bullet
Issues Surrounding Biospecimen Collection and Use in Clinical Trials
Allison R. Baer, RN, BSN, Mary Lou Smith, JD, MBA, Deborah Collyar, BS, and Jeffrey Peppercorn, MD, MPH http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900874/
bullet
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 - Basic Elements of Consent http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=50.25

 


NEWS:

bullet
What is caHUB? 
bullet
Request for Input on the Biospecimen Procurement Program for the NCI's cancer Human Biobank (caHUB)  http://bit.ly/9729P3
bullet
Lymphoma clinical trials including Gene expression analysis  http://bit.ly/8Y8lGR
bullet
The Biology of Human Lymphoid Malignancies Revealed by Gene Expression Profiling
Louis M. Staudt and Sandeep Dave http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov (full text)
bullet
Bio-bank Best Practices:  Patient Perspectives on the issue of transfer of tissue for clinical use –  particularly for use in translational clinical research  PDF 

"we may not have fully considered that requests for transfer of tissue for clinical use could many times be in harmony with the ultimate objective of achieving “personalized medicine,” and the oft-stated principle of  “partnering with patients”  – particularly when used to determine eligibility for clinical trials."

Ownership Issues

Based on candid feedback from a prominent lymphoma investigator, local institution “ownership” of extra tissue seems a major challenge to implementing the caHUB – along with competing research interest, at least at the major centers. 

So who “owns”  or more precisely decides on use of the extra tissue?  The surgeon, the pathology department, the larger institution who owns the storage units, the patient’s treating physician, or the patient?   

It seems that we are too often defaulting to No Use (discarding it), or Unproductive Local Use, because the institutions haven’t thought this through and believe they have ownership rights in these matters.  It seems a legal and ethical question begging for a process to deliberate it.

Some suggestions:

·         A Stick: Perhaps participation in caHUB could be required for any center that receives Federal monies?  Consenting standards might be required of any institutions that take and store diagnostic tissue samples as a condition of Federal licensing, with an option to send extra tissue to caHUB if those standards cannot be met.   

·         Carrot: Centers that participate in caHUB might be given advertizing money to inform the public of the added benefit of coming to their center for diagnostic procedures.  (Or be named in such ads, similar to what is done for franchise businesses)

·         Public Education:  NCI should explain the vital role of caHUB in the public media.   It could be important to raise awareness of tissue ownership issues, and how use of tissue is being decided on today (contentiously or by default). 

·         Dealing with competing interest:  Perhaps an independent advisory committee could be formed to decide on these matters, with strong patient representation – to decide which research projects have the most scientific promise and are the best fit for any previously signed consent agreements.   Individual patients can opt out, always, but the recommendation of the committee might be binding otherwise. 

There seems an urgent need to cut the Gordian knot: the contentious debates over use of tissue, by every stakeholder but the patient.

 


Resources

  1. The NBN blueprint document: (~226 pages)  PDF  
    (It may take some time for this large document to appear in your browser.)  
  2. Molecular Targeting in the Treatment of Cancer: An Interview With Brian Druker, MD  Medscape (free login req.)  Related commentary: See the National Biospecimen Network 
  3. Staudt, Gene Expression Profiling of Lymphoid Malignancies -  Annu.Rev.Med.2002.53:303–18  PubMed
  4. Advances in the Treatment of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma - Dr. Cheson  Medscape (free login)
  5. Innovation or Stagnation? Challenge and Opportunity on  the Critical Path to New Medical Products PDF 2004 FDA 2004
  6. Molecular Diagnostics  Rita M. Braziel, Margaret A. Shipp, Andrew L. Feldman, Virginia Espina, Mary Winters, Elaine S. Jaffe, Emanuel F. Petricoin III and Lance A. Liotta  asheducationbook.org
  7. Primer on Medical Genomics Part III: Microarray Experiments and Data Analysis
    Ayalew Tefferi, et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:927-940  PDF 
  8. Clinical Application of cDNA Microarrays in Oncology ~ Full text  theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/
  9. Gene expression profiling in Follicular Lymphoma to assess clinical aggressiveness and to guide the choice of treatment. Blood. 2004 Sep 2 PMID: 15345589 | Related abstracts
  10. [2266] Follicular Lymphoma: Design of a Protein-Based Survival Predictor Using Tissue-Microarrays (TMA). Session Type: Poster Session 479-II  ASH 2004
  11. [1125] Gene Expression Profiling Analysis in Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma Allows To Predict Survival and Histological Transformation. Session Type: Poster Session 279-I  ASH 2004
  12. Scientists Unlocking Lymphoma's Secrets - The microenvironment   accessatlanta 
     
    "Genetic differences -- not in lymphoma cells, but in immune cells surrounding the tumor -- may determine how aggressive a particular case of follicular lymphoma turns out to be"
  13. Molecular Diagnostics on Lymphoid Malignancies ~ Wing C. Chan, MD; Kai Fu, MD, PhD  allenpress.com
  14. Study Demonstrates Gene Expression Microarrays Are Comparable And Reproducible  sciencedaily.com
    "A study funded by the National Cancer Institute, part of the National Institutes of Health, shows for the first time that microarray data generated in different laboratories can produce highly comparable results. For this comparison study, appearing in the Jan. 15, 2005, Clinical Cancer Research*, four separate laboratories analyzed gene expression (whether genes are turned on or off) for the same set of human tumor tissues. Overall, the expression profiles of portions of individual samples were highly comparable, and the experimental correlation between separate labs was only slightly lower than correlation of duplicated experiments within the same labs."
  15. Researchers Use Novel Technology To Extract RNA From Archive 
    Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded Tissue  sciencedaily.com 
     
    "Recent advances in both laser-capture microdissection (LCM) technology and microarray technology have revolutionized our investigation of the genetic basis of human cancer," ... "Pure cell populations can now be isolated ... and evaluated for changes in gene expression that accompany the development of cancer. However, applying these techniques to archived clinical specimens has been limited by our inability to extract high-quality genetic material from routinely processed clinical samples."
  16. How patients can help accelerate advanced tissue-based research  http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/ 
  17. Improving Diagnosis and Treatment of Lymphomas with Gene Expression Profiling   hematology.org 
    Joseph M. Connors, M.D.
     
    "Major new insights into the biology of lymphomas have resulted from the use of microarray gene expression technology to elucidate their underlying biology and to identify novel pathways for therapeutic intervention."
  18. Biobank Central  biobankcentral.org  

    BioBank Central aims to describe the activities of modern biobanks in all their breadth, ranging from the absolute requirement to protect the interests of patients and healthy volunteers who choose to donate samples and data, to the critical role of these biorepositories in enabling modern biomedical research.
  19. caBIG: Power of Connection™ - Dr. Barker provides a preview.   cabig.cancer.gov
    The video explores the challenges of cancer research and how caBIG™ 
    will speed research discoveries and improve patient outcomes by connecting 
    the cancer community.
    Also see Glossary: http://cabig.cancer.gov/resources/glossary.asp
  20. caIMAGE: Enabling Standardization and Collaboration  cabig.cancer.gov 

    Greater reliance on imaging in clinical care and biomedical research, the current structure of clinical studies, and other advances in technology have led to an enormous increase in the quantity and complexity of cancer imaging data. Despite this increase, however, there is little standardization of protocols used to acquire, analyze, and annotate images among cancer centers and other research facilities.
  21. GenePattern - Integrated Genomics - now a part of caBIG  cabig.cancer.gov 

    One feature unique to GenePattern is the ability to track the different steps that a researcher takes when analyzing a set of data. These computational and research steps, known as a “pipeline,” are stored along with their parameters on the GenePattern server. Researchers with access to the dataset can request that the same analytical steps, or “pipeline,” be repeated and/or combined with other pipelines. Reproducibility, an essential feature of many successful research projects, can be easily accomplished using GenePattern. Also, the ability to string together pipelines opens the door to new discoveries by enabling the exploration of increasingly complex hypotheses.
  22. The Office of Biorepositories  NCI 
  23. Modernizing Cancer Research  PAL PDF 
  24. Biospecimen Basics  http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/global/pdfs/BiospecimenBasics.pdf 
  25. NCI Best Practices (2007) http://biospecimens.cancer.gov/global/pdfs/NCI_Best_Practices_060507.pdf 
  26. Biospecimens: Challenges and Solutions in Clinical Cancer Research  www.calgb.org/Public/publications/calgabs/2006/winter2006.pdf 
  27. Tissue preparation (devil in the details)  www.nature.com

    According to experts, there are more than a billion tissue samples archived in hospitals and tissue banks around the world, most of them formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE). Today, these samples present both an incredible opportunity and a huge challenge to researchers. FFPE tissue samples have been extensively annotated and well preserved, allowing detailed study of the progression of diseases such as cancer. But due to the method of preservation, obtaining biomolecules from these samples is proving difficult, to say the least.
  28. Biobanking of fresh frozen tissue: RNA is stable in nonfixed surgical specimens www.nature.com | PDF

    Our data indicate that nonfixed tissue specimens may be transported on ice for hours without any major influence on RNA quality and expression of the selected genes. However, further studies are warranted to clarify the impact of transport logistics on global gene expression.
  29. Battling the Hematological Malignancies: The 200 Years' War

    Full article  http://theoncologist.alphamedpress.org/cgi/content/full/13/2/126 
  30. Gene expression signatures in follicular lymphoma: are they ready for the clinic?  http://haematologica.org/cgi/content/full/93/7/982 
  31. NEW The Biology of Human Lymphoid Malignancies Revealed by Gene Expression Profiling
    Louis M. Staudt and Sandeep Dave http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov (full text)

 

 
Disclaimer:  The information on Lymphomation.org is not intended to be a substitute for 
professional medical advice or to replace your relationship with a physician.
For all medical concerns,  you should always consult your doctor. 
Patients Against Lymphoma, Copyright © 2004,  All Rights Reserved.