|
Click
here
to send us your recommended trials, comments, or suggestions
Audience and
purpose: A tool for physicians, patients and
caregivers. An aid in the discussion of trials.
|
| |
Terms |
Clinical rationale:
Why participation in the study could be
reasonable as a treatment decision. You can
follow the numbered link to 7
Reasons to Consider Trials based on clinical
circumstances for details. |
| |
and |
Scientific rationale:
A composite score - our estimate of the potential of the study to
change clinical practice or the clinical
relevance of the study question - such as if it
potentially addresses on unmet need. |
| |
limitations |
Need to Treat:
In general for indolent lymphoma when the Need to Treat is not
specified in the eligibility criteria the results of the study may be less
generalizable. |
| |
|
Goal of therapy:
an impression of the typical goal of therapy for
the
clinical indication, such as curative intent for
aggressive lymphoma. (A question mark (?) indicates that
the potential to reach the goal is
low or controversial. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Small
Lymphocytic Leukemia
(CLL/SLL)
(also
indolent NHL)
|
< Key Eligibility
v Protocol / Agent |
Study Questions of Interest |
Clinical
rationale? |
Scientific
Rationale
4 = highest |
Goal of Therapy
for Indication |
|
> |
CLL/SLL |
PCI-32765 for Special Cases of CLL or SLL |
Over 65 yrs with Need to Treat, OR any age with 17p or
p53 risk factor |
PCI-32765
a btk-inhibitor |
Activity and safety of PCI-32765 an oral targeted drug
for special cases of CLL/SLL |
1, 4, 7 |
3
|
Management
Reports |
|
> |
CLL/SLL |
PCI-32765 With FCR or With BR in CLL or SLL |
Need to Treat |
btk-inhibitor with
FCR or
with BR |
Safety of PCI-32765 an oral targeted drug when combined
with competing standard chemos |
1, 4, 7 |
3 |
Durable remission
/
cure?
Reports |
|
|
|
Return to Top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Nervous System
Lymphoma
(CNSL)
|
< Key Eligibility
v Protocol / Agent |
Study Questions of Interest |
Clinical
rationale? |
Scientific
Rationale
4 = highest |
Goal of Therapy
for Indication |
|
> |
CNSL |
Combination Chemo With or Without Autologous Stem Cell
Transplant in Treating Patients With CNS B-Cell Lymphoma |
Previously untreated; primary central
nervous system (CNS) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma |
Combination chemo with high-dose
therapy and autologous SCT vs.
Combination chemo with consolidation chemo |
"How well combination chemotherapy
given together with autologous stem cell transplant
works compared to combination chemotherapy alone in
treating patients with central nervous system B-cell
lymphoma" - a high risk lymphoma |
2, 7 |
4
|
Curative intent
Reports |
|
|
|
Return to Top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
(DLBCL) and PMBCL
(also
B-cell NHL)
|
< Key Eligibility
v Protocol / Agent |
Study Questions of Interest |
Clinical
Rationale? |
Scientific
Rationale
4 = highest |
Goal of Therapy
for Indication |
|
> |
DLBCL |
Rituxan and Combination Chemo Treating Patients with
DLBCL |
Previously Untreated |
R-CHOP vs.
R-EPOCH |
Compare efficacy of Rituxan-based Chemos. Evaluate
molecular predictors of outcome |
2, 7 |
4, 7 |
Curative intent
Reports |
|
> |
DLBCL |
Navitoclax in Addition to B-R in Patients With Relapsed
DLBCL |
Relapsed; not eligible for high-dose chemo - with Stem
Cell rescue |
BCL-2 inhibitor
with BR vs.
BR |
Compare Efficacy of Navitoclax with B-R chemo to B-R in
patients ineligible for high dose therapy |
4, 6 |
4
|
Curative intent |
Follicular lymphoma (FL)
(also
indolent NHL)
|
< Key Eligibility
v Protocol / Agent |
Study Questions of Interest |
Clinical
Rationale? |
Scientific
Rationale
4 = highest |
Goal of Therapy
for Indication |
|
> |
Follicular |
Low-Dose MTX and Bexxar for Untreated, Advanced-Stage,
Follicular |
Untreated;
Need to Treat
not
specified |
Bexxar after
low dose MTX
chemo |
Will using low-dose Methotrexate with
Bexxar improve safety of Bexxar?
Compare response rate to historical expectations |
1 |
2 |
Durable remission
/ cure?
Reports |
|
> |
Follicular |
Combination Veltuzumab and Fractionated 90Y- Epratuzumab
Radioimmunotherapy in Follicular Lymphoma |
Previously untreated
with systemic therapy; measurable disease
but not bulky
and not stage I/II. |
CD20 antibody (Veltuzumab) followed by
Fractionated cd22 (radio-labeled antibody -
90Y-Epratuzumab) |
What is the efficacy and safety of novel (and non-
competing)
antibody-based therapy as first treatment |
1, 4, 7 |
2 |
Durable remission
/ cure?
Reports |
|
> |
Follicular |
Rituximab and/or Lenalidomide in Treating Patients With
Follicular Not Refractory to Rituximab |
Relapsed;
responsive to last
Rituxan;
Need to Treat
not
specified |
Rituxan vs. Lenalidomide vs. Lenalidomide
+ Rituxan |
What is the efficacy (response rate and time to
progression) and safety of Len-based treatment when
added to or compared to Rituxan? |
7 |
3 |
Management
Reports |
|
|
|
Return to Top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL)
|
< Key Eligibility
v Protocol / Agent |
Study Questions of Interest |
Clinical
Rationale? |
Scientific
Rationale
4 = highest |
Goal of Therapy
for Indication |
|
> |
Hodgkin |
Brentuximab Vedotin Before Autologous Stem Cell
Transplant in Treating Patients With Hodgkin |
Relapsed or refractory
to primary therapy;
cd30
expressed
on tumor cells |
brentuximab
vedotin (BV)
an antibody-drug conjugate |
Activity of BV prior to autologous stem cell rescue |
4, 6 |
4
|
Curative intent
with less toxicity
Reports |
|
> |
Hodgkin |
Chemo Based on PET Scan in Treating Patients With Stage
I or Stage II Hodgkin |
Previously Untreated;
non-bulky stage I/II |
ABVD x2 then
based on PET:
ABVD x2 OR
BEACOPP x2 then
IFRT (radiotherapy) |
Can PET imaging predict who needs more aggressive
BEACOPP chemo and IFRT therapy, and who can benefit from
additional but less toxic ABVD? (Response-adapted
decision making) |
3, 7 |
4 |
Curative intent with less toxicity
Reports |
|
|
|
Return to Top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
< Key Eligibility
v Protocol / Agent |
Study Questions of Interest |
Clinical
Rationale? |
Scientific
Rationale
4 = highest |
Goal of Therapy
for Indication |
|
> |
MCL |
Safety and Efficacy of PCI-32765 in Relapsed /
Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma |
Previously Untreated;
Did not achieve PR or had progression after most recent
treatment |
PC1-32765 - a oral
agent that targets
btk |
How well can an oral targeted drug manage relapsed and
refractory indolent lymphoma and for how long? |
4, 6, 7 |
4, 7 |
Curative intent
Reports |
|
|
|
Return to Top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
B-cell NHL
mixed types
(aggressive or indolent)
|
< Key Eligibility
v Protocol / Agent |
Study Questions of Interest |
Clinical
Rationale? |
Scientific
Rationale
4 = highest |
Goal of Therapy
for Indication |
|
> |
b-cell
NHL,
high-risk,
many types |
Genetically Engineered Lymphocyte Therapy in B-Cell
NHL/CLL Refractory to Chemo |
Relapsed from at least 2 prior treatments
- the last
less than 1 year; cd19 expressed on tumor |
Engineered t-cells targeting cd19
(CAR19) |
Can placing a gene into white blood cells may make the
body build an immune response to kill cancer cells? |
1, 6 |
4 |
Durable remission
/
cure?
Reports |
|
> |
Hodgkin |
Rituxan/Bendamustine/PCI-32765 in Relapsed DLBCL, MCL,
or Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma |
relapsed DLBCL, MCL,
or indolent NHL
|
Rituxan, Bendamustine, and btk
inhibitor
(PCI-32765) |
What is the maximum tolerated dose of
PCI-32765; what is the overall response rate? |
6, 7 |
3 |
Curative intent or durable complete
response?
Reports |
|
|
|
Return to Top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indolent (low grade) B-cell NHL
- mixed types
|
< Key Eligibility
v Protocol / Agent |
Study Question of Interest |
Clinical
Rationale? |
Scientific
Rationale
4 = highest |
Goal of Therapy
for Indication |
|
> |
indolent
b-cell
(FL, MZL, SLL) |
TLR8 Agonist VTX-2337 in Combo With Local Radiation in
Low-Grade B-cell Lymphomas |
Relapsed from prior therapy;
one site of disease accessible for intratumoral
injection |
TLR8 Agonist
(VTX-2337) |
To determine the local and systemic
anti-tumor effects of intratumoral injection of
TLR8 agonist, in combination with low-dose local
radiation at a single tumor site |
4, 5, 7 |
2 |
Management in refractory setting
Reports |
|
> |
indolent
b-cell NHL
(FL, SLL,
LPL, MZL) |
Efficacy and Safety of CAL-101 in Patients With Indolent
B-Cell NHL (DELTA) |
Relapsed from at least 2 prior chemo- or
immunotherapy-based regimens - refractory to Rituxan AND
to alkylating agent (not transformed) |
CAL101 - a oral
agent that targets
PI3k delta kinase |
Activity and safety of study drug in relapsed and
refractory indolent lymphoma; how long the oral study
drug can be given to manage the condition? |
7 |
3 |
Management in refractory setting
Reports |
|
|
|
Return to Top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
T-cell NHL
- mixed types
|
< Key Eligibility
v Protocol / Agent |
Study Question of Interest |
Clinical
Rationale? |
Scientific
Rationale
4 = highest |
Goal of Therapy
for Indication |
|
> |
cutaneous T-cell lymphoma
(CTCL) |
O6-Benzylguanine and Topical Carmustine in
Early-Stage(IA-IIA) Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma |
early stage ; failed at least one
conventional treatment |
O6-Benzylguanine and Topical
Carmustine |
To measure response rate and response
time. |
1, 6 |
4 |
Management in refractory setting
Reports |
|
> |
t-cell NHL
(PTCL, and other aggressive types) |
SAHA + CHOP in Untreated T-cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma |
Newly diagnosed T-cell lymphoma (mixed
type), systemic (not localized) |
SAHA (Vorinostat)
and CHOP |
Activity and safety of study protocol
in untreated t-cell lymphoma, which has a high relapse
rate when treated with standard CHOP |
6 |
2 |
Curative intent
Reports |
|
|
|
Return to Top |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SEE ALSO
Locate Trials by Type of Lymphoma & Treatment Status
|
|
|
|