Ask Question
Sign Guest book

 
About Lymphoma
| Advocacy & Art | CAM & Life Style | Clinical trials | Doctors & Centers  | Guidelines  at  Diagnosis | How  to   Help  | Research | Side Effects  | Support | Symptoms  | Tests | Treatments


WebCasts

What's a Drug?

  

Treatment Overview > What's a Drug?

Last update: 06/25/2007

NATURAL MEDICINES 

"It isn't very surprising that plants contain anti-cancer chemicals; they have being fighting a biochemical war against the world's animals for approximately 300 million years (land plants, anyway..) and have hence evolved chemicals that probably interfere with virtually every biochemical pathway that exists. Hence it is very likely that there are chemicals out there that interfere with those chemical pathways crucial to the survival and proliferation of cancer cells.

However, this does NOT mean that 'natural is best'. First, the compound in question will only fight cancer as a secondary effect to it's primary purpose (killing an insect that feeds on the plant, for instance). Hence a synthetic derivative may be far more effective. Second, the compound may be too unstable in vivo, so again a synthetic derivatives will be more successful. Thirdly, useful dose ranges (between ' no effect' and 'killing the patient') may be quite narrow, making direct consumption of leaves/bark/etc either ineffective or highly dangerous or both.

In short, the 'big pharma' versions of these 'natural' drugs are going to be more effective. That does not mean that all information from these companies should be taken uncritically at face value - you should always look closely and critically at the real data supporting the claims made. However, at least this is possible. With alternative 'cures', all you get is the marketing."

posted by Andrew Dodds to

scienceblogs.com 

 

HETEROGENEITY:

One reason cancers are challenging to treat is the molecular processes and mutations within the cells can vary, even within the same types of lymphoma, sometimes partly nullifying how well a drug works, even in different patients with the same diagnosis. 

Still another challenge of determining safe and effective drug dosage is related to inherited  differences in patients known as normal genetic variations or genotypes.  These normal individual variations, similar to what determines our eye color, can affect the clearance rates of drugs. 

To deal with these variations (the heterogeneity of the disease and the patient), a personalized approach to medicine is evolving. 

Advanced tests, such as molecular profiling, is slowly becoming the basis for therapies tailored for individual patients.  Investigators are actively designing and validating the new tools that are essential  realizing this goal. (See for details NBN)

Accelerating progress also requires adopting common standards and platforms for sharing data across trials. We need more coordination and research to account for the variables underlying the myriad molecular pathways of disease. We may need to protect or increase incentives to achieve these goals …and more aggressive leadership in this area.

Preclinical research must be better able to predict active and toxic agents before the human phase of development as in the FDA's Critical Path. Studies that incorporate molecular profiling and less toxic immunotherapies may  be more reasonable as treatment decisions to patients concerned about the risks of new investigational  therapies. 

In addition to answering important clinical questions, studies must be reasonable as treatment decisions both to the participant and their physicians - not as an afterthought, but at the outset. This should hold true for the first line, relapsed and refractory settings.

It seems also that we should give community doctors incentives to refer patients to trials, perhaps recognition awards could be 

Finally, we need to educate the patient community about the process and the importance of participating in credible medical research. We must address misinformation and wishful thinking about some alternative practices, which by definition have not been evaluated objectively.

 

SPECIFICITY

For cancer therapy the state of the art is still mainly chemotherapy, which 
has some degree of specificity ... because most chemo agents are selectively  toxic to dividing cells. Thankfully!, blood cell cancers are typically  highly sensitive to chemo- and radio-therapies. But we need to improve on  this. 

The big improvement in recent years has been from antibody therapy: Rituxan  and RIT. Here the specificity is improved: The range of cells affected by  therapy are reduced dramatically to one type: mature b-cells that express  cd20 - normal and malignant. Importantly, immature normal b-cells are not  effected, because they do not have cd20, allowing new mature b-cells to 
replace those eliminated by treatment.

Anyone trying to get rid of dandelions understands the concept of  specificity. You can spray the entire lawn with chemical - a systemic approach. The chemical sticks mainly on broad leaf plants. But this method  also does harm to your soil, the ground water, and to beneficial plants and  critters. (For the record, I hand pick them ... highly specific, but also unrealistic on a large lawn!)

... if we could only train rabbits to eat only dandelion ... ?

The way our immune systems works to remove infection and cancers is highly  specific. 

You get the mumps once, because your immune system recognizes the unique antigens of the mumps virus. Once eliminated, memory cells remain on guard and will execute a fast and furious assault on the virus should it ever try to reenter the premises. It's so efficient that you'll not even know that the battle occurred.

Both the positive and negative impact of immunity on lymphomas is not fully understood (not nearly so), but knowledge about it is accelerating, and a consensus is emerging that immunity against lymphoma plays a significant part in clinical outcomes ... in how fast or slow the lymphoma progresses; in spontaneous regressions; and even in the response to standard therapy.

The long time it takes to develop new treatments can generate understandable impatience in patient groups. Why does it take so long?  What goes on when these drugs are in your body? How does your body react to the exotic molecules? 

A drug's job is to interfere with a disease pathway or symptoms. Some drugs are very familiar and some have been around for a long time. Aspirin, for example, can help with pain by dealing with inflammatory enzymes. Some painkillers lock up neural receptors to reduce the sensation of pain.  An antibiotic, such as the well-known penicillin, may clobber the bacteria of infection. 

Infection, pain and cancers have always plagued us. People have used plants, minerals and animal parts as medicine from time immemorial. Even today, there is some interest in using herbs without an understanding of how or if they work. (See sidebar on NATURAL MEDICINES.) 

Before aspirin there was willow bark. Opium and cocaine gave pain relief to our primitive ancestors. Early scientists extracted and purified the active ingredients from such early drugs. Then clever organic chemists delighted in fragmenting these molecules in order to find their structures. 

Aspirin and penicillin have been around for a long time, but the drugs that stop and kill cancer cells are among the newest drugs being discovered and fine-tuned. 

How do scientists develop them? ...  How do we know what happens when a drug is received in the body, introduced by mouth, IV drip, or by patch?   Briefly, the investigation most go through three phases: preclinical, clinical (human testing), and regulatory assessment. 

The first task in in the preclinical phase is to find a promising compound and then to determine how much of the drug is needed to do the job. The necessary concentration is determined in preclinical experiments involving cell cultures as in the well-known Petrie dish, or with animals.  

(NOTE: This phase is essential to credible drug research. Homeopathy - using very minute doses of compounds to treat medical conditions - has not been validated as affective in any blinded randomized trials.)

In the body the drug interacts with, binds to, or disrupts, some process underlying the disease. Targets of the compound can be cell membranes; enzymes, structures or carriers - all proteins - or any one of the cellular chemicals or processes that have been hijacked to keep the disease going. 

The fit between a drug and a body molecule or diseased cell structure is known as affinity.  One important goal of therapy related to affinity is specificity ... that the compound binds as exclusively possible to the target of treatment and minimally impairs normal processes. 

The interaction between drug and disease is known as mechanism of action

However, even well targeted drugs, such as the cancer drug Gleevec, can have significant side effects, emphasizing the need for caution in the testing of new drugs in human subjects.  

A relatively new drug target is found on the surface of cancer cells. These are molecular binding sites. One, known as CD20, is targeted by the drug Rituxan.  Here a man made antibody binds to the CD20 receptor which can cause the cell to self destruct, or leads to killing of the cell by immune cells.

The field of identifying new potential drug targets is accelerating at a rapid pace.  Targets may be within the cell, such proteins or genes that prevent cell death, on the cell surface as described above, or the target may be other "normal" cells that contribute to the survival and expansion of the malignant cells in the tumor microenvironment.

Many chemotherapy drugs exploit the overt behavior of cancerous cells - rapid cell division.  The dividing cell more readily takes up the drug, which leads to damage of its DNA (the vital information that determine cell behavior and functions).  ...


Source: http://www.nih.gov/sigs/aig/ 

... The cell, detecting the damage to its DNA , self destructs in a process called apoptosis.  An everyday example of apoptosis is peeling skin that results from sunburn.  

Pharmacokinetics, or PK for short, is yet another essential part of new drug development and assessment in the clinical phase.  It's the study of what your body does to a drug. The initial PK research is carried out on animals and then ever so slowly and carefully in humans. 

How long the drug remains in the bloodstream, and at what concentration, are vital to the safety and effectiveness of drug, which are determined by Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion. (ADME for short). 

The organs that have a major impact on ADME are the liver and the kidneys.  Individual differences in patients can result in faster or slower clearance of the drug from the body. Differences in clearance rates can affect the course of treatment and severity of side effects.  (See also the side bar on HETEROGENEITY.)

If the drug remains in the blood too long it can increase side effects. Conversely, a drug that's excreted or cleared too rapidly will not be around long enough, or at the proper concentration, to do its job well.

Moreover, interaction with other drugs or herbs can affect how drugs are absorbed or cleared from the body. 

Yet another aspect of the drug development and testing is the called pharmacodynamics, or PD, which is the



Source: http://www.gmhc.org/health/treatment/ti/ti1507.html 

The larger the window the more likely the drug can be administered in a safe and effective protocol. 

Finally, if the new drugs shows reasonable safety and activity in early phases of clinical trials, it is then tested against approved therapies in large randomized controlled clinical trials.  The goal of these phase III studies is to objectively determine the safety and efficacy in a way that minimizes bias, which can result from patient selection in smaller non-randomized studies.  

Only 1 in 5,000 new compounds evaluated in the preclinical stage makes it to the clinic ... and about 1 in 5 new therapies that reach phase III clinical testing. 

It's worth noting the regulatory evaluation of the data for approval does not take very long ... about 6 months. The preclinical and clinical testing phase can take ten years or longer. The cost to the sponsor can reach 1 billion dollars.

~ John Dixon and Karl Schwartz

 
 
Disclaimer:  The information presented on Lymphomation.org is not intended to be a substitute for 
professional medical advice or to replace your relationship with a physician.
For all medical concerns,  you should always consult your doctor. 
Patients Against Lymphoma, Copyright © 2004,  All Rights Reserved.